Full text:

PDF

Author: Andrey M. Ranchin
Information about the author:

Andrey M. Ranchin, DSc in Philology, Professor, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Philological Faculty, 1st housing, Leninskie gory, GSP-1, 119991 Moscow, Russia. 

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0414-5106 

E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

EDN:

https://elibrary.ru/FNEUYY

For citation:

Ranchin, A.M. “To the Question of Dating the Vita of Theodosius of the Caves.” Germenevtika drevnerusskoi literatury [Hermeneutics of Old Russian Literature]. Issue 23. Ed.-in-chief O.A. Tufanova. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2024, pp. 371–400. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.22455/HORL.1607-6192-2024-23-371-400 

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/HORL.1607-6192-2024-23-371-400
UDC: 821.161.1.0
Keywords: Life (Vita) of Theodosius of the Caves, dating, hypotheses, bottom line, upper bound.

Abstract

The article deals with hypotheses regarding the dating of Life (Vita) of Theodosius of the Caves. Two versions are in the focus of attention: the creation of the monument no later than 1088, before the death of Caves abbot Nikon (a hypothesis put forward by A.Yu. Kubaerv and accepted by A.A. Shakhmatov, new arguments in favor of which were relatively recently brought by A. Poppe), and not earlier than 1107–1108 (the hypothesis proposed by S.A. Bugoslavsky, currently defended by Yu.A. Artamonov). Evidence is given in favor of writing the Life (Vita) between March 1088 and August 1091, after the death of Nikon and before the transfer of the relics of Theodosius to a new church. A strong argument against the version that the Life (Vita) of Nikon was written during Nikon’s lifetime is calling him a “luminary” on a par with the long-dead Theodosius and Anthony and calling him “great.” No less strong argument against the version of the creation of the literary monument in 1107– 1108 is the lack of news about the transfer of the relics of the monk. The rest of the evidence substantiating both the earlier and later versions of the writing of Nestor’s work does not seem convincing. Thus, the lower (terminus post quem) and upper (terminus ante quem) chronological boundaries are established quite definitely. 

References 

1 Artamonov, Iu.A. “‘Gipoteza, vystroennaia na gipotezakh’: Po povodu novogo issledovaniia A. Poppe” [“‘Hypothesis Built on Hypotheses’: Regarding the New Study by A. Poppe”]. Vestnik tserkovnoi istorii, no. 1–2 (29–30), pp. 361–387. (In Russian) 

2 Artamonov, Iu.A. “Zhitie Feodosiia Pecherskogo: problemy istochnikovedeniia” [“Life (Vita) of Theodosius of the Caves: Problems of Source Studies”]. Stoliarova, L.V., ed. Drevneishie gosudarstva Vostochnoi Evropy. 2000 g.: Problemy istochnikovedeniia [Ancient States of Eastern Europe. 2000: Problems of Source Studies]. Moscow, Izdatel’skaia firma “Vostochnaia literatura” RAS Publ., 2003, pр. 173–277. (In Russian) 

3 Artamonov, Iu.A. “K voprosu o vremeni i istorii napisaniia letopisnogo rasskaza stat’i 6599 (1091) g. o perenesenii moshchei prepodobnogo Feodosiia Pecherskogo” [“On the Question of the Time and History of Writing the Chronicle Story of the Article 6599 (1091) on the Transfer of the Relics of St. Theodosius of the Caves”]. Drevniaia Rus’: Voprosy medievistiki, no. 3 (33), 2008, pp. 11–12. (In Russian) 

4 Bilenkin, V. “‘Chtenie’ prep. Nestora kak pamiatnik ‘gleboborisovskogo kul’ta’.” [“‘Reading’ by Reverend Nestor as a Monument to the ‘Gleboborisovsky Cult’.”]. Trudy Otdela drevnerusskoi literatury Instituta russkoi literatury (Pushkinskogo Doma) RAN [Proceedings of the Department of Old Russian Literature], vol. 47. St. Petersburg, Dmitrii Bulanin Publ., 1993, pp. 54–64. (In Russian) 

5 Bugoslavskii, S.A. “K voprosu o kharaktere i ob”eme literaturnoi deiatel’nosti prepodobnogo Nestora. (Posviashchaetsia akademiku V.N. Perettsu). I–III” [“On the Question of Nature and Scope of the Literary Activity of St. Nestor. (Dedicated to Academician V.N Peretz). I–III]. Izvestiia Otdeleniia russkogo iazyka i slovesnosti Imperatorskoi Akademii nauk, vol. XIX, book 1, 1914, pp. 131–186. (In Russian) 

6 Vinogradov, A.Iu. “Osobennosti borisoglebskikh torzhestv v svete vizantiiskoi traditsii” [“Features of Boris and Gleb Festivals in the Light of Byzantine Tradition”]. Slověne = Slovѣne: Interational Journal of Slavic Studies, vol. 1, no. 2, 2012, pp. 117–134. (In Russian) 

7 Golubinskii, E. Istoriia kanonizatsii sviatykh v Russkoi tserkvi [History of the Canonization of Saints in the Russian Church]. 2nd ed., rev. and add. Moscow, University Printing House Publ., 1903. 597 p. (In Russian) 

8 Kubarev, A. “O Paterike Pecherskom” [“On a Paterik Pechersky”]. Zhurnal Ministerstva narodnogo prosveshcheniia, no. X, 1838, pp. 1–34. (In Russian) 

9 Kuz’min, A.G. “Kogda Nestor napisal Zhitie Feodosiia” [“When Nestor Wrote the Life (Vita) of Theodosius”]. Uchenye zapiski Riazanskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta, vol. 61, 1970, pp. 256–263. (In Russian) 

10 Kuz’min, A.G. Nachal’nye etapy drevnerusskogo letopisaniia [Initial Stages of Old Russian Chronicle Writing]. Moscow, Lomonosov Moscow University Publ., 1977. 407 p. (In Russian) 

11 Mikheev, S.M. Kto pisal “Povest’ vremennykh let?” [Who Wrote “The Tale of Bygone Years?”] Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2011. 280 p. (In Russian) 

12 Ol’shevskaia, L.A. “Tipologo-tekstologicheskii analiz spiskov i redaktsii Kievo- Pecherskogo paterika” [“Typological and Textological Analysis of Lists and Editions of the Kyiv-Pechersk Patericon”]. Ol’shevskaia, L.A., and S.N. Travnikov, pub. prep., Demin, A.S., resp. ed. Drevnerusskie pateriki: Kievo-Pecherskii paterik. Volokolamskii paterik [Old Russian Patericons: Kyiv-Pechersk Patericon. Volokolamsk Patericon]. Mosсow, Nauka Publ., 1999, рр. 253–315. (In Russian)

13 Poppe, A. Studity na Rusi: Istoki i nachal’naia istoriia Kievo-Pecherskogo monastyria. [Studites in Rus’. Origins and Initial History of the Kyiv Caves Monastery]. Kyiv, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Institute of History of Ukraine, Center for the History of Kyiv Rus Publ., 2011. 150 p. (In Russian) 

14 Priselkov, M.D. Nestor Letopisets [Nestor the Chronicler]. Moscow, Russkii mir Publ., 2009. 160 p. (In Russian) 

15 Ranchin, A.M. “Zhitie Feodosiia Pecherskogo: traditsionnost’ i original’nost’ poetiki” [“Life (Vita) of Theodosius of the Caves. Tradition and Originality of Poetics”]. Eadem. Vertograd zlatoslovnyi: Drevnerusskaia knizhnost’ v interpretatsiiakh, razborakh i kommentariiakh [Vertograd Zlatoslovny: Old Russian Bookishness in Interpretations, Analysis and Comments]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2007, pp. 165–180. (In Russian) 

16 Ranchin, A. Nestor Letopisets [Nestor the Chronicler]. Moscow, Molodaia gvardiia Publ., 2022. 349 p. (In Russ.) 

17 Rusinov, V.N. “Zhitie Feodosiia Pecherskogo i problemy ego nauchnoi kritiki” [“Life (Vita) of Theodosius of the Caves and the Problems of His Scientific Criticism”]. Problemy proiskhozhdeniia i bytovaniia pamiatnikov drevnerusskoi pis’mennosti i literatury [Problems of the Origin and Existence of Monuments of Old Russian Writing and Literature]. Nizhnii Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod University Publ., 1995, pp. 3–23. (In Russian) 

18 Rusinov, V.N. “Letopisnye stat’i 1051–1117 gg. v sviazi s problemoi avtorstva i redaktsii ‘Povesti vremennykh let’.” [“Chronicle Articles 1051–1117 in Connection with the Problem of Authorship and Editions of ‘The Tale of Bygone Years’.”]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriia Istoriia, iss. 1 (2), 2003, pp. 111–147. (In Russian) 

19 Sverdlov, M.B. Domongol’skaia Rus’: Kniaz’ i kniazheskaia vlast’ na Rusi VI — pervoi treti XIII vv. [Pre-Mongol Rus: Prince and princely power in Rus’ VI — the first third of the 13th Centuries]. St. Petersburg, Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 2003. 736 p. (In Russian) 

20 Sobolevskii, A.I. “Pamiat’ i pokhvala sv. Vladimiru i ‘Skazanie o svv. Borise i Glebe’.” (Po povodu stat’i g. Levitskogo) [“Memory and Praise” of St. Vladimir and ‘The Tale about St. Boris and Glebe’.” (Regarding the Article by Mr. Levitsky)]. Khristianskoe chtenie, vol. 202, part 1, 1892, pp. 791–804. (In Russian) 

21 Tolochko, A. Istoriia Rossiiskaia Vasiliia Tatishcheva: Istochniki i izvestiia [Russian History by Vasily Tatishchev: Sources and News]. Moscow, Kyiv, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2005. 544 p. (In Russian) 

22 Uzhankov, A.N. “K voprosu o datirovke ‘Zhitiia Feodosiia Pecherskogo’.” [“On the Issue of Dating the ‘Life (Vita) of Theodosius of the Caves’.”]. Germenevtika drevnerusskoi literatury [Hermeneutics of Old Russian Literature]. Issue 10, Ljustrov, M.Yu., ex. ed. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2000. pp. 70–79. (In Russian) 

23 Uzhankov, A.N. “Sviatye strastoterptsy Boris i Gleb: k istorii kanonizatsii i napisaniia zhitii” [“Holy Passion-bearers Boris and Gleb: on the History of Canonization and Writing of Lives”]. Drevniaia Rus’: Voprosy medievistiki, no. 2 (16), 2000, pp. 28–50. (In Russian) 

24 Uzhankov, A.N. “‘Zhitie Feodosiia Pecherskogo’: k voprosu o datirovke” [“‘The Life (Vita) of Theodosius of Pechersk’: on the Issue of Dating”]. Uzhankov, A.N. Problemy istoriografii i tekstologii drevnerusskoi knizhnosti XI–XIII vv. [Problems of Historiography and Textual Criticism of Old Russian Literature of the 11th–13th Centuries]. Moscow, Rukopisnye pamiatniki Drevnei Rusi Publ., 2009, pp. 199–214. (In Russian) 

25 Shakhmatov, A.A. Istoriia russkogo letopisaniia [History of Russian Chronicle Writing], vol. 1, book 2. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2003. 1023 p. (In Russian) 

26 Shifman, I.Sh. “Psalom 151 (Opyt tekstologicheskogo issledovaniia)” [“Psalm 151 (Experience in Textual Research)”]. Pis’mennye pamiatniki Vostoka: Istoriko-filologicheskie issledovaniia: Ezhegodnik 1978–1979 [Written Monuments of the East: Historical and Philological Studies: Yearbook 1978–1979]. Moscow, Nauka; Glavnaia redaktsiia vostochnoi literatury Publ., 1987, pp. 146–155. (In Russian) 

27 <Iakovlev, V.A.> Drevnekievskie religioznye skazaniia, issledovanie V. Iakovleva [Old Kyiv Religious Legends, Research by V. Yakovlev]. Warszawa, V tipografii Uchebnogo okruga Publ., 1875, 160+II p. (In Russian) 

28 Bosley, Richard David. A History of the Cults of SS. Theodosij and Antonij of the Kyiv Cave Monastery (Dissertation). Yale, University of Yale, 1980. 216 p. (In English) 

29 Poppe, Andrzej. “Chronologia utworów Nestora-hagiografa.” Slavia Orientalis, vol. 14, 1965, pp. 287–305. (In Polish) 

30 Timberlake, Alan. “The Origins of ‘Anonymous’s Skazanie’ and Nestor’s ‘Chtenie o svv. Muchenikakh Borise i Glebe’.” Russkii iazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, no. 1 (11), 2006, pp. 156–194. (In English)