Full text:

PDF

Author: Vladimir V. Milkov
Information about the author:

Vladimir V. Mil’kov (1951–2021), DSc in Philosophy, Leading Research Fellow, Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Goncharnaya 12, bldg. 1, 109240 Moscow, Russia.

EDN:

https://elibrary.ru/SSJAGE

For citation:

Mil’kov, V.V. “Attitude to Usury in Old Russia of the 12th Century.” Germenevtika drevnerusskoi literatury [Hermeneutics of Old Russian Literature]. Issue 21. Ed.-in-chief O.A. Tufanova. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., 2022, pp. 345–367. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.22455/HORL.1607-6192-2022-21-345-367 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/HORL.1607-6192-2022-21-345-367
UDC: 821.161.1.0
Keywords: usury, anti-growth uprising of 1113 in Kiev, Сharter of Vladimir Monomakh on cuts, inconsistency in the fight against usury.
Date of publication: 16.12.2022

Abstract:

In the article based on a large number of historical sources, the author analyzes the attitude of the Old Russian hierarchs to usury (mainly in the 12th century). Church rules on the usury sin are analyzed in detail. The Old Russian hierarchs were guided by the rules of the translated nomokanons. It was established that some hierarchs did not show rigor to eradicate the sin of lichoism (Novgorod bishop Lukа Zhidyatа, Novgorod archybishop Nifont, metropolitan Nikifor). An irreconcilable fighter against moneylenders was the Novgorod archbishop Ilya-Ioann. Hierarchs focused on different recommendations of church rules, which differed significantly from each other. This explains the paradox of difference. In 1113, an uprising broke out in Kiev against moneylenders. Riot was stopped by Vladimir Monomakh, who was called to the Grand Duke’s table. He also took measures to prevent profit at the expense of gigantic interest. In the situation of 1113, he developed the Charter on Cuts, which was included in the Russkaya Pravda (Russian Justice). However, the usury was not outlawed by Monomakh. He only limited the “great rez (cut),” alleviating the position of debtors. The most basic anti-usurious declaration was stated in Asking by Quiricus of Novgorod. Problem of usury sin did not lose relevance in subsequent years. Since the party of principled fighters against usury was small and did not win influence, sin continued to exist for centuries.

REFERENCES

1 Beneshevich, V.N. Drevneslavianskaia kormchaia XIV titulov bez tolkovanii [Old Slavic Helmsman of 14th Titles without Interpretation, vol. 2], publ. Iu.K. Begunov, I.S. Chichurov, Ia.N. Shchapov, under dir. Ia.N. Shchapov. Sofiia, Bolgarskaia akademiia nauk Publ., 1987. 331 p. (In Russian)

2 Bugrov, A.V. “Ssudnye operatsii russkikh monastyrei v XIV–XVII vv.” [“Loan Operations of Russian Monasteries in the 14th–17th Centuries”]. Vestnik Banka Rossii, no. 18 (742), 2004, pp. 31–35. (In Russian)

3 Dadykina, M.M. Kabaly Spaso-Prilutskogo monastyria vtoroi poloviny XVI–XVII vv. Issledovanie. Teksty [Cabals of the Spaso-Prilutsky Monastery in the Second Half of the 16th–17th Centuries. Study. Texts]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Al’ians-Arkheo Publ., 2011. 379 p. (In Russian)

4 Dergacheva, I.V., Mil’kov, V.V., Mil’kova, S.V. Luka Zhidiata [Luka Zhidiata]. Moscow, Mir filosofii Publ., 2016. 413 p. (In Russian)

5 Dragunkina, N.V., Prikhod’ko, A. “O rostovshchichestve i protsente” [“On an Usury and Interest”]. Istoriia ekonomicheskikh uchenii. Otvety na ekzamenatsionnye voprosy: uchebnoe posobie dlia vuzov [History of Economic Thought. Answers to Exam Questions: Textbook for Universities]. Moscow, Ekzamen Publ., 2005, pp. 17–19. (In Russian)

6 Ivanov, V.I. Monastyri i monastyrskie krest’iane Pomor’ia v XVI–XVII vv.: mekhanizm stanovleniia krepostnogo prava [Monasteries and Monastic Peasants of Pomorye in the 16th–17th Centuries: the Mechanism of the Formation of Serfdom]. St. Petersburg, Oleg Obyshko Publ., 2007. 600 p. (In Russian)

7 Lukin, S.V. “Nekotorye aspekty khristianskogo normativnogo ucheniia o protsente” [“Some Aspects of the Christian Normative Doctrine of Interest”]. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki (Evraziiskii netraditsionnyi nauchno-analiticheskii zhurnal) [Problems of Modern Economics (Eurasian Non-traditional Scientific and Analytical Journal)], issue 28, no. 4, 2008, pp. 159–168. (In Russian)

8 Mil’kov, V.V., Simonov, R.A. Kirik Novgorodets: uchenyi i myslitel’ [Quiricus of Novgorod: Scientist and Thinker]. Moscow, Krug Publ., 2011. 537 p. (In Russian)

9 Miule, E. “Torgovlia i denezhnye operatsii v rannikh novgorodskikh berestianykh gramotakh (XI — pervaia chetvert’ XIII v.)” [“Trade and Monetary Transactions in the Early Novgorod Birch Bark Letters (11th – the first quarter of the 13th Century)”]. Ianin, V.L., editor. Berestianye gramoty: 50 let otkrytiia i izucheniia [Birch Bark Letters: 50 Years of Discovery and Study]. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2003, pp. 85–95. (In Russian)

10 Pasynkov, A. Istoriia rostovshchichestva v Rossiiskoi imperii [History of Usury in the Russian Empire]. Available at: https://proza.ru/2019/12/08/1736 (Accessed 23 March 2021). (In Russian)

11 Pobedimova, G.L. “O nekotorykh formakh kreditovaniia krest’ian Iosifo- Volokolamskogo monastyria v pervoi polovine XVI veka” [“On Some Forms of Lending to the Peasants of Joseph-Volokolamsk Monastery in the First Half of the 16th Century”]. Krest’ianstvo i klassovaia bor’ba v feodal’noi Rossii [Peasantry and Class Struggle in Feudal Russia]. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1967, pp. 91–97. (In Russian)

12 Rostislavov, D.I. “Opyt issledovaniia ob imushchestvakh i dokhodakh nashikh monastyrei” [“Research Experience on the Property and Income of Our Monasteries”]. Monastyrskoe rostovshchichestvo na Rusi. Zakabalenie krest’ian s pomoshch’iu rostovshchichestva [Monastic Usury in Russia. Enslavement of Peasants with the Help of Usury]. Available at: https://salik.biz/articles/60367 (Accessed 23 March 2021). (In Russian)

13 Tikhomirov, M.N. Posobie dlia izucheniia Russkoi Pravdy [Manual for the Study of Russian Justice]. Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 1953. 192 p. (In Russian)

14 Tseluikina, E.S. “Dolgovye i kabal’nye zapisi kak istochnik dlia izucheniia monastyrskikh zaemshchikov v razgar Smutnogo vremeni (1606–1609)” [“Debt and Enslaving Records as a Source for Studying Monastic Borrowers in the Midst of Time of Troubles (1606–1609)”]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Series: History. Regional Studies. International Relationships, vol. 24, no. 2, 2019, pp. 62–76. (In Russian)

15 Ianin, V.L., Zalizniak, A.A. Novgorodskie gramoty na bereste (iz raskopok 1990–1996 g.) [Novgorod Letters on Birch Bark (from Excavations in 1990–1996)], vol. X. Moscow, Russkie slovari Publ., 2000. 432 p. (In Russian)

16 Ianin, V.L., Zalizniak, A.A., Gippius A.A. Novgorodskie gramoty na bereste (iz raskopok 1997–2000) [Novgorod Letters on Birch Bark (from Excavations in 1997–2000)], vol. XI. Moscow, Russkie slovari Publ., 2004. 286 p. (In Russian)